Walk away from my treatment?
I was diagnosed with leukemia in december 2008. i've completed 4 cycles, 2 verbs bone marrows and with exercise coming back into worthy health. the pain i had back becoming ill is gone. my doctors feel i need at most minuscule 2 more cycles. i don't want to. i am afraid. i almost didn't make it out the last cycle because of a fever. i believe the body wishes time to heal. my doctor believes that with my type of cancer the body they must hit my bone marrow hard and repeatedly... when is it enough. my spirit is good and i've met wonderful cancer survivor's who encourage to stir with my heart..
Answers: It’s your life and your decision and there is plentifully to be said about your gut feeling. On the other hand I work near a lot of doctors and most take great care contained by determining what is best for their patients and many sometimes loose sleep over it. So I’m sure your doctor is giving you the best advice they can. Maybe you should get an evaluation from another oncologist and have them both explain the reasons for their conclusions. Best wishes.
It's up to you. Make sure that you fully work out the science behind the doctor's recommendation before decide.
best opportunity that cancer patients have to beat their disease is upon initial diagnosis. This is your one best shot at eradicating the disease. If recurrence occur, then you are in a much weaker position to fight put a bet on because the disease is then metastasized and tends to be more aggressive.
Think it through. The decision, risk, and consequences are entirely yours to carry.
You need to talk to your doctor roughly the statistical rates of relapse. Compare what the rate is if you stop now with what the rate will be if you complete your treatment. Is the increase in risk worth not going through treatment because of suspicion?
My choice was to verbs through treatment. I was on life support for 2.5 weeks in septic shock, and almost walk away from my treatment after. It was worse than any other experienced I have ever had surrounded by my life and has taken a long time to recover from mentally... still not even sure if I am even in a minute. I was back in remission at that point, but statistically if I have stopped treatment there, I would have relapsed again in smaller quantity than a year and there isnt much they can do with a third occurance. But if I continued treatment, it was expected that I would stay surrounded by remission, and so far I have. Fear of the treatment wasnt enough at that point to deny treatment and die. Although, if I relapse again, I may be at that point.
The reason they own you do so many treatments after remission with leukemia is because of that high risk of relapse. A bone marrow biopsy cant detect the leukemia until its already within and effecting you. I had a clean biopsy, 2 months after that clean blood work, and 2 months after that the leukemia be back so fast and so much that they didnt even have to do the biopsy to know it be back. And that was with the completion of treatment.
though your marrow is showing verbs when testing, in all liklihood, in that is still leukemia in it that we just dont have the technologic facility to see. The extra cycles are there to try to ensure they get all of the cancer. If they dont bring back all of the cancer,there is more risk you will relapse and its harder the second time. While I am not a doctor and cant say anything just about your case, and you should talk to your doctor specifically about the statistics.... they are pushing you to complete treatment *because* of how lofty the relapse rate is without it.
If you choose not to continue treatment, make sure you FULLY appreciate what that means, and how it effects your relapse chances. Knowledge is power, so make sure your choice is an adjectives one, and not based on fear alone. Source(s): Ive had aml twice.
Related Questions:
Answers: It’s your life and your decision and there is plentifully to be said about your gut feeling. On the other hand I work near a lot of doctors and most take great care contained by determining what is best for their patients and many sometimes loose sleep over it. So I’m sure your doctor is giving you the best advice they can. Maybe you should get an evaluation from another oncologist and have them both explain the reasons for their conclusions. Best wishes.
It's up to you. Make sure that you fully work out the science behind the doctor's recommendation before decide.
best opportunity that cancer patients have to beat their disease is upon initial diagnosis. This is your one best shot at eradicating the disease. If recurrence occur, then you are in a much weaker position to fight put a bet on because the disease is then metastasized and tends to be more aggressive.
Think it through. The decision, risk, and consequences are entirely yours to carry.
You need to talk to your doctor roughly the statistical rates of relapse. Compare what the rate is if you stop now with what the rate will be if you complete your treatment. Is the increase in risk worth not going through treatment because of suspicion?
My choice was to verbs through treatment. I was on life support for 2.5 weeks in septic shock, and almost walk away from my treatment after. It was worse than any other experienced I have ever had surrounded by my life and has taken a long time to recover from mentally... still not even sure if I am even in a minute. I was back in remission at that point, but statistically if I have stopped treatment there, I would have relapsed again in smaller quantity than a year and there isnt much they can do with a third occurance. But if I continued treatment, it was expected that I would stay surrounded by remission, and so far I have. Fear of the treatment wasnt enough at that point to deny treatment and die. Although, if I relapse again, I may be at that point.
The reason they own you do so many treatments after remission with leukemia is because of that high risk of relapse. A bone marrow biopsy cant detect the leukemia until its already within and effecting you. I had a clean biopsy, 2 months after that clean blood work, and 2 months after that the leukemia be back so fast and so much that they didnt even have to do the biopsy to know it be back. And that was with the completion of treatment.
though your marrow is showing verbs when testing, in all liklihood, in that is still leukemia in it that we just dont have the technologic facility to see. The extra cycles are there to try to ensure they get all of the cancer. If they dont bring back all of the cancer,there is more risk you will relapse and its harder the second time. While I am not a doctor and cant say anything just about your case, and you should talk to your doctor specifically about the statistics.... they are pushing you to complete treatment *because* of how lofty the relapse rate is without it.
If you choose not to continue treatment, make sure you FULLY appreciate what that means, and how it effects your relapse chances. Knowledge is power, so make sure your choice is an adjectives one, and not based on fear alone. Source(s): Ive had aml twice.
Related Questions:
- Do I enjoy Ewing's Sarcoma? If I don't own it, what could it be?
- How do you cope beside a parent who have cancer?
- Is at hand such entity as have a tumor surrounded by your nipple?
- Is it true that you win skin cancer if you renovation your skin color?
- What is that item i.e. growing on my bicep?
- Lumps lower than armpits 5 weeks?