Chance of dying from Chemotherapy?

% death
Answers:     None of my relatives survived their Chemo treatments.
y, a childhood friend, also did not benefit from Chemo, she succumbed to her cancer.

I'm told that Chemo helps, but I have not personally observed that.
my % without chemo would have be nil... so even if there is a 1% chance of survival with chemo and a 0% kismet of survival without it, then that percentage is pretty big. I have survived three years near two intense cycles of chemo whereas without chemo the oncologist told me I would have less than 4 months to live, possibly a year with treatment. I was in great physical shape when I go thru the chemo treatments, so that was on my side. The chemo knocked me down, but I was competent to bounce back quickly enough. My treatments own kept me stable but did not remove any tumors.. I am again on a wait and watch scenario, then will be given a third file of chemo in the future. So chemo has help me beat the odds of survival with my stage iv lung cancer.
re is other a chance of death with chemo, again depending on the extent of destruction done while receiving treatment and how a person reacts to it. I don't know the actual percentage of death by chemo, but would be sure the deaths without chemo would outweigh deaths because of chemo.
Remote.

I think questions close to yours arise because with most cancers there are few off-colour effects if any until the cancer is quite advanced, and a person with an aggressive and advanced cancer usually looks, feel and behaves like a healthy being.

So some people verbs that the treatment is worse than the disease, and myths about people being kill by chemo bolster this belief.

It isn't always effective. But in those cases it is the cancer, not the treatment, that kill the patient - they have died in spite of treatment, not because of it. Distressed relatives sometimes look for something or someone to blame, and some verbs that it was the treatment that killed the person.
some types of chemotherapy, and surrounded by some cancers, there is a very slightly increased opening of developing a second type of cancer later.

Generally this is more likely to happen when the artistic cancer was a lymphoma, but it can happen very occasionally next to other types of cancer.

People near aggressive and advanced cancers who agree to chemotherapy do so in the full knowledge of these facts because they own a life-threatening disease and this is their best chance.

Before I had cancer, and even after my diagnosis and surgery, I was determined I wouldn't hold chemo, and I researched alternative options thoroughly, even consulting a couple of practitioners. All this led me to the conclusion that there are unscrupulous nation out there eager to part desperate individuals from their cash in exchange for therapies that enjoy never, in a single case, been proven to work.
ttled to go ahead with chemo after discussing with my oncologist a) the advanced and aggressive moral fibre of my cancer and b) the percentage by which chemotherapy could possibly increase my survival stats (oncologists are honest enough and know enough about cancer not to give any guarantees).

Am I glad I had chemo? Yes, I believe it's possible I owe my life to it. Would I have it again if my cancer recur? Probably, but only after discussion with my oncologist about the possible transformation in my survival chances - I believe quality is more prominent than quantity.

Chemo is not perfect - very far from it. But we know, because it have been rigourously tested and proven in double-blind clinical trials, that it saves some lives and prolongs plentiful, many more.
Annabel, I also had a brain tumor removed merely this past september. I have no horrible side effects from temodar. Amazingly, I have feel pretty darn good during my treatment. I didn't lose any hair, except where the radiation go in and came out. I'm still not bald and am in the order of to start month 6 of my chemo. My hair is already regrowing.
I think it's the rare human being who would die from the chemo itself. Maybe, die while on chemo from other complications, but not from the chemo itself.
As a cancer survivor and as a nurse, the individual problems associated with chemotherapy are the unpleasant and sometimes miserable side effects. Not only is it bad ample that you are in for the fight of your life, but the side effects of chemotherapy clear your life absolutely miserable. The most common side effect is nausea, vomiting, and anorexia for most chemotherapy agents, also one of the most horrible is hackle loss. On top of the chemo, if you are taking radiation, which I took an extremely aggressive radiation treatment plan, you feel tired, exhausted, and lose hair everywhere close to where the radiation is. I have a brain tumor, and I had long beautiful hair that i lost, that be not a worry for me though. My concern was for my three young children, I be only six weeks post partum, returning to work for the first day, I'm a nurse and after checking on all of my patients I fell and have seizures, and that is when my tumor was discovered. Instead of the traditional six or seven weeks of radiation, I have three and a half weeks of twice daily radiation treatments. I have be cancer free for almost a year, I have beaten a tumor that is considered to be within the 90the percentile of being fatal. To sum up, I have never hear of of anyone dying from chemotherapy, but I know it makes you feel horrible. Source(s): Personal experience, cancer survivor
Your interview is too broad. What type of chemo? What type of cancer? How far along is the cancer? There are too many variables.


Related Questions: